Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A Survey of Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts

Identifieur interne : 007041 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 007040; suivant : 007042

A Survey of Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts

Auteurs : Michael Waliszewski [États-Unis] ; Alexander Shor [États-Unis] ; James Brudvik [États-Unis] ; Ariel J. Raigrodski [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:2C7209F142D9EBB0C81C9B924C0EAF673B0D70AB

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Statement of Problem:  Despite the fact that solutions to functional problems are available, successfully restoring the appearance of an edentulous patient remains a challenge. Purpose:  The aim of this survey was to determine if edentulous respondents could differentiate among three denture esthetic concepts and if there was an overall preference among the three. Materials and Methods:  Six edentulous test subjects were selected based on age and smile cri‐teria. One wax tooth arrangement was completed according to each of the three esthetic concepts for a total of three wax tooth arrangements per test subject. The three esthetic concepts followed were natural, supernormal, and denture look. Standardized full‐face digital photographs were made of each arrangement (three) during maximum smile for each subject (six). These 18 photographs were included in a questionnaire. Respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 147 completed questionnaires were analyzed. Results:  Ninety‐six percent of respondents were able to differentiate among the three esthetic denture concepts. Natural tooth arrangements were preferred by 55% of the respondents, supernormal tooth arrangements were preferred by 19%, and the denture look arrangements were preferred by 26%. Conclusion:  Within the limitations of this survey, the questionnaire respondents differentiated between the three esthetic denture concepts. The tooth arrangement most closely resembling the anatomical average was selected by 55% of the respondents. Preference for a particular concept changed when responses to each test subject set were considered individually. Demographic factors do not significantly affect patient preference.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00048.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">A Survey of Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Waliszewski, Michael" sort="Waliszewski, Michael" uniqKey="Waliszewski M" first="Michael" last="Waliszewski">Michael Waliszewski</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shor, Alexander" sort="Shor, Alexander" uniqKey="Shor A" first="Alexander" last="Shor">Alexander Shor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brudvik, James" sort="Brudvik, James" uniqKey="Brudvik J" first="James" last="Brudvik">James Brudvik</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Raigrodski, Ariel J" sort="Raigrodski, Ariel J" uniqKey="Raigrodski A" first="Ariel J." last="Raigrodski">Ariel J. Raigrodski</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2C7209F142D9EBB0C81C9B924C0EAF673B0D70AB</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00048.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2C7209F142D9EBB0C81C9B924C0EAF673B0D70AB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001562</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001562</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001562</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002D42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002D42</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1496-4155:2006:Waliszewski M:a:survey:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17083441</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002832</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002832</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002832</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002832</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002832</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">002832</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001B09</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">001B09</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">001B09</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1496-4155:2006:Waliszewski M:a:survey:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">007168</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">007041</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">007041</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">A Survey of Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Waliszewski, Michael" sort="Waliszewski, Michael" uniqKey="Waliszewski M" first="Michael" last="Waliszewski">Michael Waliszewski</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Clinical assistant professor, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Wisconsin</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shor, Alexander" sort="Shor, Alexander" uniqKey="Shor A" first="Alexander" last="Shor">Alexander Shor</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Affiliate assistant professor, University of Washington, Seattle, WA</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Washington (État)</region>
<settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Washington</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brudvik, James" sort="Brudvik, James" uniqKey="Brudvik J" first="James" last="Brudvik">James Brudvik</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Professor emeritus, University of Washington, Seattle, WA</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Washington (État)</region>
<settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Washington</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Raigrodski, Ariel J" sort="Raigrodski, Ariel J" uniqKey="Raigrodski A" first="Ariel J." last="Raigrodski">Ariel J. Raigrodski</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Associate professor and director, Graduate Prosthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Washington (État)</region>
<settlement type="city">Seattle</settlement>
</placeName>
<orgName type="university">Université de Washington</orgName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1708-8240</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">18</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="352">352</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="368">368</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">17</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-11">2006-11</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1496-4155</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Age Factors</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Antaris figure</term>
<term>Anterior mold ratio</term>
<term>Anterior teeth</term>
<term>Authors journal compilation</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard waliszewski</term>
<term>Body image</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Clear preference</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Complete denture construction</term>
<term>Complete denture therapy</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Concept arrangements</term>
<term>Concept photographs</term>
<term>Concepts figure</term>
<term>Concepts table</term>
<term>Contour waxing</term>
<term>Copyright</term>
<term>Correct color</term>
<term>Data analysis</term>
<term>Demographic factors</term>
<term>Demographic interactions</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dent assoc</term>
<term>Dental appearance</term>
<term>Dental esthetics</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentate</term>
<term>Dentogenic restorations</term>
<term>Dentsply</term>
<term>Dentsply caulk</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture esthetics</term>
<term>Denture, Complete (psychology)</term>
<term>Different denture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patient</term>
<term>Edentulous patient preference</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous respondents</term>
<term>Edentulous survey respondents</term>
<term>Esthetic</term>
<term>Esthetic concepts</term>
<term>Esthetic denture concepts</term>
<term>Esthetic evaluation</term>
<term>Esthetic preference</term>
<term>Esthetics</term>
<term>Facial midline</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Female figure</term>
<term>Final image evaluation</term>
<term>Frush</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Guideline</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Important property</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Male figure</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary cast</term>
<term>Maxillary teeth</term>
<term>Maximum smile</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Midline</term>
<term>Mold figure</term>
<term>Mouth, Edentulous (psychology)</term>
<term>Munksgaard</term>
<term>Natural arrangement</term>
<term>Natural concept</term>
<term>Natural occlusal plane maxillary incisal plane</term>
<term>Null hypothesis</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Older adults</term>
<term>Particular concept</term>
<term>Patient involvement</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Postaris</term>
<term>Postaris figure</term>
<term>Posterior teeth</term>
<term>Preference</term>
<term>Preference ratio</term>
<term>Probability degrees</term>
<term>Proportion changes</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthet dent frush</term>
<term>Prosthet dent lombardi</term>
<term>Questionnaire respondents</term>
<term>Record bases</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Statistic significance level</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Study protocol</term>
<term>Supernormal</term>
<term>Supernormal arrangement</term>
<term>Supernormal concept</term>
<term>Survey respondents</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Test subject</term>
<term>Test subjects</term>
<term>Tooth (anatomy & histology)</term>
<term>Tooth arrangement</term>
<term>Tooth arrangement teeth</term>
<term>Tooth arrangements</term>
<term>Tooth form</term>
<term>Tooth position</term>
<term>Tooth repositioning</term>
<term>Tooth selection</term>
<term>Trubyte trublend</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Vertical dimension</term>
<term>Waliszewski</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Bouche édentée (psychologie)</term>
<term>Dent (anatomie et histologie)</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Facteurs de l'âge</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Loi du khi-deux</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète (psychologie)</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomie et histologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Dent</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Tooth</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Bouche édentée</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Denture, Complete</term>
<term>Mouth, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Age Factors</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Antaris figure</term>
<term>Anterior mold ratio</term>
<term>Anterior teeth</term>
<term>Authors journal compilation</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard</term>
<term>Blackwell munksgaard waliszewski</term>
<term>Body image</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Clear preference</term>
<term>Complete denture</term>
<term>Complete denture construction</term>
<term>Complete denture therapy</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Concept arrangements</term>
<term>Concept photographs</term>
<term>Concepts figure</term>
<term>Concepts table</term>
<term>Contour waxing</term>
<term>Copyright</term>
<term>Correct color</term>
<term>Data analysis</term>
<term>Demographic factors</term>
<term>Demographic interactions</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dent assoc</term>
<term>Dental appearance</term>
<term>Dental esthetics</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentate</term>
<term>Dentogenic restorations</term>
<term>Dentsply</term>
<term>Dentsply caulk</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture esthetics</term>
<term>Different denture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patient</term>
<term>Edentulous patient preference</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous respondents</term>
<term>Edentulous survey respondents</term>
<term>Esthetic</term>
<term>Esthetic concepts</term>
<term>Esthetic denture concepts</term>
<term>Esthetic evaluation</term>
<term>Esthetic preference</term>
<term>Esthetics</term>
<term>Facial midline</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Female figure</term>
<term>Final image evaluation</term>
<term>Frush</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Guideline</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Important property</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Male figure</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary cast</term>
<term>Maxillary teeth</term>
<term>Maximum smile</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Midline</term>
<term>Mold figure</term>
<term>Munksgaard</term>
<term>Natural arrangement</term>
<term>Natural concept</term>
<term>Natural occlusal plane maxillary incisal plane</term>
<term>Null hypothesis</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Older adults</term>
<term>Particular concept</term>
<term>Patient involvement</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Postaris</term>
<term>Postaris figure</term>
<term>Posterior teeth</term>
<term>Preference</term>
<term>Preference ratio</term>
<term>Probability degrees</term>
<term>Proportion changes</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthet dent frush</term>
<term>Prosthet dent lombardi</term>
<term>Questionnaire respondents</term>
<term>Record bases</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Statistic significance level</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Study protocol</term>
<term>Supernormal</term>
<term>Supernormal arrangement</term>
<term>Supernormal concept</term>
<term>Survey respondents</term>
<term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term>
<term>Test subject</term>
<term>Test subjects</term>
<term>Tooth arrangement</term>
<term>Tooth arrangement teeth</term>
<term>Tooth arrangements</term>
<term>Tooth form</term>
<term>Tooth position</term>
<term>Tooth repositioning</term>
<term>Tooth selection</term>
<term>Trubyte trublend</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Vertical dimension</term>
<term>Waliszewski</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Droit d'auteur</term>
<term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term>
<term>Facteurs de l'âge</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Loi du khi-deux</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Statement of Problem:  Despite the fact that solutions to functional problems are available, successfully restoring the appearance of an edentulous patient remains a challenge. Purpose:  The aim of this survey was to determine if edentulous respondents could differentiate among three denture esthetic concepts and if there was an overall preference among the three. Materials and Methods:  Six edentulous test subjects were selected based on age and smile cri‐teria. One wax tooth arrangement was completed according to each of the three esthetic concepts for a total of three wax tooth arrangements per test subject. The three esthetic concepts followed were natural, supernormal, and denture look. Standardized full‐face digital photographs were made of each arrangement (three) during maximum smile for each subject (six). These 18 photographs were included in a questionnaire. Respondents were asked questions about their preference among the three randomly ordered concept photographs for each of the six subjects. A total of 147 completed questionnaires were analyzed. Results:  Ninety‐six percent of respondents were able to differentiate among the three esthetic denture concepts. Natural tooth arrangements were preferred by 55% of the respondents, supernormal tooth arrangements were preferred by 19%, and the denture look arrangements were preferred by 26%. Conclusion:  Within the limitations of this survey, the questionnaire respondents differentiated between the three esthetic denture concepts. The tooth arrangement most closely resembling the anatomical average was selected by 55% of the respondents. Preference for a particular concept changed when responses to each test subject set were considered individually. Demographic factors do not significantly affect patient preference.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Washington (État)</li>
<li>Wisconsin</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Seattle</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université de Washington</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Wisconsin">
<name sortKey="Waliszewski, Michael" sort="Waliszewski, Michael" uniqKey="Waliszewski M" first="Michael" last="Waliszewski">Michael Waliszewski</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Brudvik, James" sort="Brudvik, James" uniqKey="Brudvik J" first="James" last="Brudvik">James Brudvik</name>
<name sortKey="Raigrodski, Ariel J" sort="Raigrodski, Ariel J" uniqKey="Raigrodski A" first="Ariel J." last="Raigrodski">Ariel J. Raigrodski</name>
<name sortKey="Shor, Alexander" sort="Shor, Alexander" uniqKey="Shor A" first="Alexander" last="Shor">Alexander Shor</name>
<name sortKey="Waliszewski, Michael" sort="Waliszewski, Michael" uniqKey="Waliszewski M" first="Michael" last="Waliszewski">Michael Waliszewski</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007041 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 007041 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:2C7209F142D9EBB0C81C9B924C0EAF673B0D70AB
   |texte=   A Survey of Edentulous Patient Preference among Different Denture Esthetic Concepts
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022